Practice Areas

Monahan Law Blog

Sexual Assault and Abuse Claims

view all

Inadequate Security and Crime Victim Cases

view all

School Violence

view all

Automobile Accidents

view all

General

view all

News

more

News

Arizona Legislature Seeks to eliminate Civil Statute of Limitations

The Arizona statute of limitations reform is moving forward with a bill to eliminate the civil statute of limitations and create a window for old cases.  The measure was recently passed the Senate Judiciary Committee. The Senate president would not take up the bill, so it was added as an amendment to a house bill and passed the senate. Now the house must agree to the amendment.  As of April 2010, two states (California and Delaware) have amended and expanded the Civil Statute of Limitations for childhood sexual abuse matters.  A similar bill introduced in Pennsylvania in 2009 has been prevented from reaching a vote by the State Senate’s Judiciary chairman.

back to top

Abusive Catholic Priest from Minnesota continues to work

Rev. Joseph Palanivel Jeyapaul, "a Catholic priest who has been criminally charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl in Minnesota six years ago, is still working in his home diocese in India despite warnings to the Vatican from an American bishop that the priest continued to pose a risk to children, according to church documents made public on Monday by Attorney Jeff Anderson of St. Paul. The documents show that the American bishop warned the Vatican that the priest was accused of molesting two teenage girls whose trust he gained by promising to discuss their interest in becoming nuns."

       It has been reported by the Associated Press that Jeyapaul "said Tuesday he would willingly leave his native India and try to clear his name in the courts if the U.S. tried to extradite him. Meanwhile, the bishop who oversees the Rev. Joseph Palanivel Jeyapaul said he had overruled a Vatican recommendation that the accused priest be removed from the priesthood and applied his own lesser punishment." The Most Rev. A. Almaraj "held his own canonical trial and sentenced Jeyapaul to spend a year in a monastery."

       Jeffrey Anderson, the attorney who says the Vatican has concealed some priests' abuses, outlined on Monday the case of Jeyapaul, saying, "We are sad and we are alarmed. Sad because so many kids have been wounded and because top Vatican officials don't get it and remain in denial."

 

back to top

US Attorney Seeks to Question Pope in Child Sex Cases

Lawyer William McMurry filed a motion in a Kentucky court Tuesday seeking to take sworn testimony from the pope on what the Vatican knew about the long-running scandal of predator priests.

The motion says Benedict was aware of clergy sex abuse in the United States and that he "discouraged prosecution of accused clergy and encouraged secrecy to protect the reputation of the Church" in the 24 years that he led the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith.

"That organization was responsible for screening these cases dealing with complaints by US bishops about their various abusive priests in various dioceses," McMurry said.

The motion says documents released last week by the New York Times "unequivocally link Pope Benedict XVI, formerly Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, to child sexual abuse cases in the United States.

"These documents directly implicate Pope Benedict XVI's involvement in the Holy See's decision to cast a shroud of secrecy over clergy sexual abuse cases in the United States," it says.

The New York Times published several letters and other documents which indicated that, when he was head of the CDF, Benedict was informed of the case of a serial pedophile priest called Father Lawrence Murphy, who is accused of molesting up to 200 boys at a school for the deaf in Wisconsin.

Since the Times story broke, several other clergy sex abuse victims and their lawyers have come forward and claimed that, when he was head of the CDF, the pope was informed about predator priests who molested them, but did nothing to stop the abuse.

On Tuesday, Archbishop of Milwaukee Jerome Listecki came to the pope's defense, saying Benedict has "been firm in his commitment to combat clergy sexual abuse; root it out of the Church; reach out to those who have been harmed; and hold perpetrators accountable.

"I believe, and history will confirm, that his actions in responding to this crisis, swiftly and decisively, and his compassionate response to victims/survivors, speak for themselves," Listecki said.

The motion filed by McMurray follows on from a lawsuit filed in 2004 by three men who allege they were abused by priests in Kentucky starting as far back as 1928.

The Vatican tried to get that case dismissed, but a judge ruled in 2007 that it should go ahead and ordered "discovery" to begin -- when both sides request information and documents from the other side, using tools including questioning of witnesses, to try to "discover" pertinent facts.

 

back to top

Priest Sex Abuse Scandal Spreads to Church in Italy

The sex abuse scandal in the Roman Catholic Church came to the Pope’s doorstep last night as a group of victims appeared on Italian television to claim that two dozen priests had for decades abused children at a school for the deaf in Verona.

Three former pupils of the Antonio Provolo school who spoke on  the state broadcaster, confirmed allegations made in a signed statement last year by 67 ex-pupils who described a regime of sexual abuse, pedophilia and corporal punishment from the 1950s to the 1980s. They said that 24 priests and lay brothers from the Company of Mary order were involved.

The three said that the priests had “fondled and masturbated” them as well as sodomising them in dormitories, bathrooms and the priests’ quarters.

The case echoes one in America in which the Pope has been accused of failing to act against a priest who molested 200 boys at a school for the deaf in Wisconsin. The New York Times this week revealed that a church prosecution of Father Lawrence Murphy for sex offences between 1950 to 1974 was halted after he appealed to Benedict, then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the office charged with disciplining clergy.

The Church’s account of what Benedict had known about a pedophile priest in Germany was called into question yesterday. Father Peter Hullermann was given sanctuary in 1980 in the Munich Diocese for “therapy” after molesting a boy. A memo, the existence of which was confirmed by two German church officials, showed that Benedict — then Cardinal Ratzinger and Archbishop of Munich — not only led a meeting on January 15, 1980, approving the transfer of the priest from Essen, but that he was also kept informed of the priest’s subsequent reassignment.

It remains unclear whether he played any part in the decisions or whether he had read the memo addressed to him. Father Hullermann was convicted of sexual abuse in 1986. Now 61, he was suspended this month from his post in the Bavarian town of Bad Tölz for breaking a promise not to have contact with children and young people.

back to top

New Allegations Arise that Pope knew of Arizona Sexual Abuse cases

The abuse cases of two priests in Arizona have cast further doubt on the Catholic church's insistence that Pope Benedict XVI played no role in shielding pedophiles before he became pope. Documents reviewed by The Associated Press show that as a Vatican cardinal, the future pope took over the abuse case of the Rev. Michael Teta of Tucson, Ariz., then let it languish at the Vatican for years despite repeated pleas from the bishop for the man to be removed from the priesthood. In another Tucson case, that of Msgr. Robert Trupia," there is "no indication in the case files that Ratzinger responded" to a letter from Bishop Manuel Moreno calling Trupia "a major risk factor to the children, adolescents and adults that he many have contact with.

back to top

Wisconsin priest may have continued abuses after removal from school

The New York Times in April 2010 reported that the Rev. Lawrence C. Murphy, who "was sent to retire" to Boulder Junction, WI, in 1974, "after victims of sexual abuse demanded he be removed from work at a school for the deaf near Milwaukee," may have continued to abuse children. "Recent interviews with people who live in the area and Roman Catholic Church documents" suggested that Father Murphy, "who is accused of molesting as many as 200 boys at the school near Milwaukee, also used his family's lakefront cottage as a lure in his sexual advances, bringing youths from the school into his home beginning at least in the early 1960s." Julie Wolf, "communications director for the Archdiocese of Milwaukee, said that Father Murphy was placed on certain restrictions upon leaving Milwaukee that included not having any contact with children and that 'he ignored the restrictions.'"

 

back to top

Oregon Court considers Negligence of Boy Scouts of America

Files kept secret for decades that detail hundreds of claims of child sexual abuse by troop leaders of the Boy Scouts of America are at the center of a civil court case that began in Oregon in March 2010. Lawyers for a victim say the files show a centralized national effort to conceal abuse while lawyers for the Boy Scouts say the files demonstrate proactive efforts to stop it." The case, "a lawsuit brought by a man who was abused by a scout leader in Oregon in the early 1980s, sought $4 million in damages for the victim, who was about 12 at the time.

However, the Associated Press reported that the president of the Boy Scouts council for the Portland metro area has testified he believes the parents of some Scouts were negligent and even criminal for allowing sleepovers that led to sex abuse. Eugene Grant told a jury that parents should not have allowed boys to stay overnight with a single man at his apartment. The man, Timur Dykes, has admitted molesting the victim who filed the lawsuit and has been convicted of other sex abuse dating back to the early 1980s, when Dykes was an assistant Scoutmaster."

Later on the Oregon judge overseeing the case more than doubled the punitive damages the Boy Scouts of America could face if the organization loses the lawsuit. Multnomah County Circuit Court Judge John Wittmayer agreed during the trial to the plaintiff's request to increase possible punitive damages to $25 million from $10 million, and the total damages sought in the lawsuit to $29 million." Plaintiff lawyers "Kelly Clark and Paul Mones sought the increase after reading through confidential Boy Scout files documenting sex abuse allegations involving adult volunteers from 1965-1984."

 

back to top

Letter shows Vatican was aware of clergy abuse for decades

The head of a Roman Catholic order that specialized in the treatment of pedophile priests visited with then-Pope Paul VI nearly 50 years ago and followed up with a letter recommending the removal of pedophile priests from ministry, according to a copy of the letter obtained by The Associated Press on Wednesday." The letter "shows that the Vatican knew, or should have known, about clergy abuse in the U.S. decades ago, said Anthony DeMarco, a plaintiff attorney in Los Angeles who provided the letter. The accusation comes as plaintiffs in Kentucky are attempting to sue the Vatican for negligence for allegedly failing to alert police or the public about priests who molested children.

back to top

Lawyers say Vatican failed to remove Florida priest

Lawyers in a Florida clergy sex abuse case say the Vatican office then headed by Pope Benedict XVI failed to remove an alleged pedophile from the priesthood for years, even when the priest himself asked to be defrocked. Attorney Jessica Arbour, who represents an alleged victim of the Rev. Ernesto Garcia-Rubio in a lawsuit against the Archdiocese of Miami, also said Wednesday that the Vatican instructed church officials in Florida to shelter the priest after he was forced to leave Cuba. The lawsuit was filed last year, but the lawyers released more details of the Garcia-Rubio case amid questions about the Roman Catholic church's response to European sexual abuse allegations, and about the role of Benedict as an archbishop in his native Germany and then as head of a Vatican office.

back to top

Monahan Law Practice Publishes December 2008 Newsletter

The most recent Newsletter of Monahan Law Practice is now available for distribution by CALLING 866-307-3888 or downloading the Newsletter directly from the website.

back to top

Tavern Owner Settles with Patron Beaten by Bar's Bouncer

In Nichols v. Navarro the parties reached a settlement for $200,000 for the fractured ankle that a patron sustained after a bouncer at the bar assaulted him after he made inappropriate and racial comments to the patron's girlfriend.  Under a theory that the owner was responsible for the actions of its employees and for failing to properly supervise the bouncer, the bar owner agreed to resolve the case rather than face an Illinois jury.  The Plaintiff was represented by Regina Etherton of Chicago, Illinois.

back to top

Parents of student raped and killed in dorm at Eastern Michigan University Settles for $2.5 million before suit filed

Plaintiffs' Attorneys Bruce W. Gee and Robert J. Longstreet were successful in settling with E. Michigan University's insurance company for $2.5 million before suit was was filed by the parents on behalf of the young woman's estate.

The 22 year student was raped and killed in her dorm room at the university she attended.  The parents were first notified that the death seemed to be accidental even though she was found half nude with bruising and a pillow over her face.

Neither the victim's parents nore the campus community was notified that the death was a homicide until 10 weeks after she died.  The federal government fined the university $357,000.  The parents settled for $2.5 million claiming that the university violated federal law by not immediately notifying the community of the nature of the crime.  The girl's parents also claimed that the university failed to have adequate security since there had been an increase in crime on campus during the previous two years which the school had not addressed.

back to top

National Crime Victims Bar Association member Jeffrey R. Anderson, Esquire settles with Archdiocese of Chicago for 16 sexually abused individuals

Nationally recognized attorney Jeffrey R. Anderson settled with the Archdiocese of Chicago on behalf of 16 individuals who were sexually abused as minors by 16 Roman Catholic priests.  The suit alleged that the archdiocese failed to protect the minors against the alleged abuse despite have actual knowledged of it.

back to top

Find Out How Insurance Companies Use Trickery to Deny Legitimate Claims

The American Association of Justice (AAJ) has just released a consumer report "Tricks of the Trade" on how insurance companies deny, delay, confuse and refuse to pay legitimate insurance claims.  Copies of this report are free to the public and can be downloaded from this website under the General Category Library.

back to top

Dan Monahan forms Non-Profit to Provide Free Legal Information to Crime Victim Advocates, Victims of Crime and the General Public

In an effort to provide a center for the collection of important legal information about the civil remedies available to victims of crime who have physically abused and assaulted, psychologically damaged, or murdered due in part to the negligence of other parties, Dan Monahan has formed the Crime Victims' Information Center of Pennsylvania.  The organization's website can be found at www.cvicpa.org.

Already various state wide organizations have joined the organization as service providers and advisors to coordinate a wealth of information for victims of crime seeking additional justice through the civil justice system.

The organization provides free of charge a Crime Victim's Guide for Recovering Damages, the website mentioned above and a monthly newsletter about changing important topics of interest.  Anyone interested in receiving copies of this information may do so through the website at www.cvicpa.org.


back to top

Dan Monahan attends National Crime Victims' Bar Association National Conference in Chicago

Dan Monahan attended an intensive two day workshop and seminar in Chicago Illinois on October 19 and 20 where speakers from across the country addressed issues important to attorneys who represent victims of crime.  Included in the seminar was a book signing cocktail party for author Marci Hamilton, a professor of law at Benjamin Cardozo Law School and New York who has recently completed a book Justice Denied: What America Must Do to Protect Its Children.  Ms Hamilton calls for the elimination of all statutes of limitations of victims of childhood sexual abuse.

Topics discussed at the seminar included Clergy Sexual Abuse, Gun Manufacturers and Sellers Liability, Representing the Sex Abuse Victim in cases against Teachers and School Districts, Overcoming the School and University Immunity Defense, Maximizing Damages in a Negligent Security Case, and presenting evidence of tragic violence at trial among other topics.

back to top

back to top

Dan Monahan joins National Bar Association for Crime Victims

Dan Monahan announced that he had become affiliated with the National Crime Victim Bar Association (NCVBA) in January 2008.  The NCVBA provides technical support for attorneys representing crime victims in civil actions, refers crime victims to lawyers in their local area, and works to increase genral awareness about the availability of civil remedies for victims of crime.

Dan will be attending the 2008 National Conference in Chicago, Illinois on October 19 and 20 where the Association will be addressing a variety of topics on Civil Actions for Criminal Acts. 

back to top

Dan Monahan named "Board Certified Civil Trial Advocate" by the National Board of Trial Advocacy

  1. In July 2007 the National Board of Trial Advocacy certified Dan Monahan as a Board Certified Civil Trial Advocate.  The Board (NBTA) was created in 1977 in the public interest to identify lawyers who demonstrate that they are skilled, capable, and ethical trial lawyers.  Accredited by the American Bar Association and recognized as the only organization by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to certify attorneys, the National Board of Trial Advocacy maintains rigorous standards for the certification of civil, criminal, family law and social security disability advocates.

    In order to be certified by the organization, lawyers must successfully meet the following criteria:

1.  They must submit a list of names of judges and lawyers who are contacted by the NBTA to independently verify the lawyer's skill, experience, and even the lawyer's reputation for ethical and professional conduct.
2.  They must establish that they are in good standing with their respective state bar associations.
3.  They must pass a daylong written examination on evidence, civil trial practice and ethics.
4.  They must submit actual copies of their written legal work for review.
5.  They must provide documentation to prove their active involvement in multiple trials before judges and juries.

To learn more about the National Board of Trial Advocacy and board certification, or if you are seeking an attorney outside of Pennsylvania, visit their website at www.nbtanet.org.


back to top

American Association of Justice holds annual meeting in Philadelphia in July 2008

In July 2008 the American Association of Justice, formerly known as the American Trial Lawyers' Association, held their annual conference in Philadelphia where thousands of trial lawyers from around the country met for four days to hear from some of the nation's experts on civil jury trial preparation, new trends in pursuing the rights of injured victims, and sharpening skills for the presentation of cases for juries.

As a Section member of both the Inadequate Security and School Violence Litigation Groups, Dan Monahan had the opportunity to meet with and discuss recent developments in this area of the law including the conclusion of the litigation in the Virginia Tech University massacre.  Douglas Fieberg, Esquire of Washington, D.C. who represented many of the families of victims of that tragedy spoke at the conference and met with individual section members to discuss the legal hurdles faced by crime victims in cases like the one at Viriginia Tech.  Shortly before the conference, it was announced in the Washington Post that a Circuit Court Judge had approved an $11 million settlement for most of the families of victims.

back to top

Products Liability Isn't Child's Play

One of the largest Toy makers in the U.S., Mattel recalled more than one million toys covered with lead paint on July 30, 2007, all of which were made in China. The recall covered 83 different products and was the second largest recall of toys this year. Fortunately, nearly two thirds of the toys were prevented from reaching the consumer by stopping the products at the distribution centers and contacting retailers like Walmart, Target and Toys R Us.

However, as many as 300,000 toys may already have been purchased by the consumer. The Consumer Product Safety Commission believes that the toys may have a date code from 109-7LF to 187-7LF. A complete list can be found at cpsc.gov.

Despite numerous safe guards that Mattel says are in place, this is the 17th recall for the company in the past 10 years. Almost half the toys it sells come from factories in China. Because many of these toys feature characters from movies and television, companies like Nickelodeon and Sesame Workshop are considering third party testing of the products. Although lead has not been used in years in the U.S. the Toy Industry's attempts to eliminate lead paint from Chinese manufacturers has not been completely successful.

Parents who believe their children or anyone else has been exposed to lead paint because of any of these toys should contact their physicians immediately.

back to top

Dan Monahan awarded Board Certified Civil Trial Advocate by National Board of Trial Advocacy

In July 2007, I was pleased to learn that I had successfully met all the requirements to be recognized as a Board Certified Civil Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy.

The National Board of Trial Advocacy or NBTA was created in 1977 in the public interest to identify lawyers who demonstrated that they are skilled, capable and ethical trial lawyers. Accredited by the American Bar Association, and recognized as the only organization by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to certify attorneys, the National Board of Trial Advocacy maintains rigorous standards for the certification of civil, criminal, and family law advocates.

In order to be certified by the organization, lawyers must successfully meet the following criteria:

1. They must submit a list of names of judges and lawyers who are contacted by the NBTA to independently verify the lawyer’s skill, experience, and even the lawyer’s reputation for ethical and professional conduct.
2. They must establish that they are in good standing with their state bar association.
3. They must pass a day-long written examination.
4. They must submit actual copies of their written legal work for review.
5. They must provide documentation to prove their active involvement in multiple trials before judges and juries.

Most cases never actually go to trial because they are settled out of court. In fact, that may be your preference rather than risk the uncertainties of a jury verdict. However, what often motivates an opponent to settle out of court is the knowledge that you are represented by an experienced trial attorney. When such a lawyer makes a reasonable request for settlement on your behalf, the opposition may consider it unwise to take the case to trial against an experienced, skilled litigator.

Litigation is often compared to war. As in war, the side with the greatest skill and experience is usually able to avoid conflict because the opposition is not willing to risk the consequences against such an experienced opponent. Therefore, contrary to common misconception, your chance of resolving your case successfully out of court are much better when you are represented by a skilled, experienced trial lawyer who is well-known and respected by the opposition.

I am honored to have been recognized by the National Board of Trial Advocacy as a “Board Certified Civil Advocate”. If you would like to learn more about this, visit the NBTA website at www.nbtanet.org.

back to top

Medical Group Warns about the Dangers of Trampolines

A new study has shown that the number of emergency room visits by children injured on trampolines has more than doubled over the past decade. There were just over half a million such visits in the U.S. in 2000-2005 compared to a quarter million in 1990-1995. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has now urged pediatricians to tell parents not to buy trampolines for home use or let their children use home trampolines. Nevertheless, according the Academy, the message doesn’t seem to be getting through.

The AAP first called for a ban on trampolines in schools in 1977. Four years later, they allowed a trial period of limited use in schools, but stated that “the trampoline should never be used in home or recreational settings.” Researching data available from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System found a 113% increase during the time period studied above, and during those times, 95% of the injuries had occurred on home trampolines. The “dramatic increase” was likely due to increased availability of home trampolines. People can now purchase them for about $200 and 1.2 million new ones were sold in the US in 2004. Thirteen percent of the 2000-2005 injuries occurred in children younger than 5 and most involved fractures. While older children more likely suffered soft tissue type injuries, the study noted that the injuries were severe enough to bring children into the emergency room.

Accordingly, the AAP says that trampolines can never be truly safe and concludes that “Emergency physicians should join pediatricians in recommending that parents never purchase a home trampoline or allow children to use home trampolines.

back to top

Commonwealth Finalizes Rules for Vocational Experts in Workers' Compensation Cases

In an effort to clarify and explain some of the confusing procedures and requirements affecting the use of vocational experts in the field of Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation, the Commonwealth issued new Rules and Regulations to establish once and for all the qualifications of vocational experts under Act 57 and the subsequent revisions under Act 53 and to define and specify the role of the workers' compensation Judges and the conduct of the experts when dealing with the injured worker.

For the injured worker it is important to be aware of the specific requirements and obligations for the vocational expert when they involve themselves in the worker's case.

First, before conducting an earning power assessment interview, the vocational expert shall disclose to the employee, in writing, the role and limits of the vocational expert's relationship with the employee. Employees would be well advised to understanding that these vocational experts hired by the employers and insurance carriers are there to reduce your benefits, not find you alternative employment.

If the vocational expert interviews the employee, they are required to generate a written initial report detailing the expert's involvement in the litigation and conclusions form the interview. The vocational expert shall serve a copy of the initial report on the employee, and the attorney if one is involved, within 30 days of the date of the interview.

A vocational expert who authors additional written reports, including earning power assessments or labor market surveys, shall simultaneously serve copies of these additional written reports upon the employee and attorney if one is involved, when the expert provides a copy to the insurance company or their attorney.

Finally, before referring an employee for an earning power assessment interview, the insurance company is also required to disclose any financial relationship between the insurance company and the person conducting the interview.

Unfortunately, the Statutes and Case law in Pennsylvania do not really provide injured workers' with true vocational services. Workers are on their own to obtain alternative employment within their restrictions and/or re-train or re-educate themselves in new fields. The Workers' Compensation Act provides no assistance, financial or otherwise, to place injured workers back in the job market. Workers should always keep this in mind when dealing with vocational experts, who despite all good intentions perhaps, are there to serve their insurance company clients in reducing your weekly wage loss benefits.

back to top

State and Local Prosecutors Continue to Pursue Fraud

Section 305 of the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act, an addition to the Act in the mid-1990's, specifies that an employer's failure to insure its workers' compensation liability is a criminal offense. Likewise, employees who submit fraudulent workers' compensation claims have been also prosecuted across Pennsylvania.

In the most recent report from the Pennsylvania Bureau of Workers' Compensation, the State reported that six different employers were found to be in violation of the Act, subjecting them to criminal convictions and significant fines.

In Allegheny County, the owner of a local emergency service company was sentenced to probation for 2 years and ordered to pay over $125,000 in benefits. In Butler County, a local employer was required to pay $10,000 in fines, perform 120 hours of community service, and was sentenced to 5 years probation. In Columbia County, a Restaurant owner pled guilty and was fined over $14,000, ordered to pay court costs and was sentenced to 12 months probation. In Franklin County, a roofing company owner was sentenced to pay a $22,500 fine, costs of prosecution, and placed in probation for 2 years. A Lycoming County Judge, sentenced another restaurant owner to 50 hours of community service and pay a $4,900 fine. In Cambria County an employer was required to pay $152,357.43 in restitution to the claimant and was entered into a first offenders programs after paying court costs.

The State's Attorney General's Office has also brought criminal charges against two individuals, one from Chester County and the other from Indiana County. In Chester County, a woman pled guilty and was sentenced to 3 to 23 months in jail, seven year probations and ordered to pay restitution of $55,080 and all court costs for collecting the workers' compensation benefits of another worker who had been dead for 6 years.

In another case, an employee who continued to collect compensation at the same time he was working, was sentenced to 2 to 4 years and ordered to pay restitution and court costs.

Of course, the vast majority of employers and employees are honest hard working individuals or companies trying to make a living. Nevertheless, the newer provisions of the Act provide a means to weed out the dishonest companies and individuals to seek to take advantage of all the other persons who have legitimate injuries and/or the companies that rightfully carry their workers' compensation coverage.

back to top

Statistics Show Insurance Company Gouging is Cause of Increased Health Care Costs

Medical malpractice insurance companies are gouging doctors, padding their profits and driving up the cost of medicine.

Insurance rates for doctors are sky-high, but insurance company malpractice losses have fallen nearly 50 percent in three years.
For every dollar received in premiums from doctors, the insurance companies are paying out just 39 cents in claims.
Doctors should ask their insurers: “Why do my rates keep going up while your claims payments keep going down?”
There is no so-called “med mal crisis.” This report puts the lie to that claim.
The crisis involves insurance companies gouging their customers and driving up health care costs.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

KEY FACTS:

Projected and actual payouts have declined. The losses of the leading medical malpractice insurers have dropped nearly 50% over the last three years, even as the industry has publicly claimed losses are increasing.
This national decline is mirrored in Pennsylvania. 2006 data from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court show there were 1,693 filings in 2006. This represents a 38 percent decline from the base years 2000-2002. In Philadelphia, the state’s largest judicial district, the decline has been over 50 percent.
While payouts are decreasing, surplus is soaring. The 2006 surplus is 43% greater than in 2003 – greatly exceeding the surplus levels mandated to ensure a carrier’s stability.
Insurers are paying out only 39 cents for each dollar of premium they receive.

back to top

Free Books

8 Costly Mistakes to Avoid When Selecting a Personal Injury Trial Lawyer

Pennsylvania's Confusing Worker's Comp Claims and Work Related Accidents Consumer Guide

Free Consultation - Ask Us a QuestionFree Consultation - Ask Us a Question

Name:

Phone:

Email:

What is your question?


The Monahan Law Practice
300 North Pottstown Pike
Suite 210
Exton, PA 19341-2233

Phone: (610) 363-3888
Fax: (610) 363-2429

» Sign up for our Newsletter


Library

Sexual Assault and Abuse Claims

More Info

Inadequate Security and Crime Victim Cases

More Info

School Violence

More Info

Automobile Accidents

More Info

Work Injuries

More Info

Firm Newsletters

More Info

General

More Info

FAQs

Inadequate Security and Crime Victim Cases

Automobile Accidents

Work Injuries

more >

©2010 The Monahan Law Practice, All Rights Reserved, Reproduced with Permission
Attorney website design by Foster Web Marketing, the best attorney website design solution on the Web offering search engine optimization for attorneys, lawyer website design, video for attorneys, and more.
Get SEO Tips from The Attorney Internet Marketing Blog

Served By: A